Australian Election 2007 on the Internet

Compare 3 explanations of preference voting

Try and be objective - which one do you find more engaging?

From the Australian Christian Lobby:

From the Greens:

From an independent candidate:

Bob Brown of the Greens responds to Lindsay Tanner's big whinge

The ACT Greens are singing for better housing

I'm trying to connect this with Lindsay Tanner's bitterness:

Understanding Australia's voting system

This will make it much clearer...

Greens ACT candidate asks 'Who Can We Trust?'

Family First Accuse the Greens of Promoting Drug Use

Lindsay Peters - Green candidate standing against John Howard and Maxine McKew in Bennelong

Brave man - it will be an interesting campaign. He says that voting Greens and then giving preferences to a major party is an opportunity to 'vote twice'.

Here he talks about Global Warming:

Lindsay Tanner is upset about Greens campaigning against him.

He says they're receiving support from the Electrical Trades Union.

Greens-liberal-deal.com.au etc

Interesting advertisements pop up in the left-hand column of this blog. It's another angle to the election cyber-campaign.

Greens-liberal-deal.com.au says it is

'designed to allow Victorians to protest against having their voice taken away from them, thanks to the Greens Liberal deal' and 'the ALP has been actively working to ensure that Victoria remains nuclear free.'

No surprises who's behind this one. Is it just a hangover from the last State campaign or are they still angry?

Sometimes the combinations can be amusing - the three ads above right appeared together last week.

Bob Brown on the planned new pulp mill in Tasmania

He's holding regular conversations with the viewers at SenatorBobBrown.

And a local Christian pastor has his own concerns: